Wednesday, October 14, 2009

John, Paul, George and Stephen?

A couple of weeks ago, I put myself in the running for a student representative position in the Political Science department. From all accounts, no more than a dozen people voted. Three of those people were the three candidates running.

My first thought? Not that it was a shame that I didn't win. Instead, a sense of total discouragement. If students in political science couldn't be persuaded to stroll into their department, sign their name and put a checkmark in a box, what are the chances they will get on a bus or drive to a voting station should the Governor General call an election?

Even more, what are the chances they know who the Governor General is?

By no means am I comparing a student rep election to a federal one, in terms of the impact it will have on their lives, but the principle is the same. I think the level of voter apathy among youth is disturbing. I also think that little is being done, or can be done, to change that.

But a few days later, I came across a link to a video that caught my attention.

"Harper sings Beatles song with Yo Yo Ma."

If at this point, you're saying 'I haven't seen that because I've been living under a rock for the last three weeks'. After being terrified, nervous and completely amused, I was impressed. As far as I'm concerned, this took a lot of political balls.

Sure, he didn't sing the falsetto parts, but no one who watches that can honestly tell me it didn't make them love Canada a little bit more. Will it help Harper in the next election? Not likely. Unfortunately, I would guess this is the most young people have paid attention to the Prime Minister in their life.

The point however remains. In order for most young people to pay attention to Canadian politics, the Prime Minister has to get up on stage and cover a Beatles song.

It's easy for many people to argue that young people don't vote because they don't care. We couldn't care less who our elected government was, as long as there is one. The fact that so many young people have said in polls that they don't feel their vote means anything, is blamed on ignorance and a lack of caring.

The truth is, youth voter apathy is a direct result of the system we have in place. Young people feel that their votes don't count, because they often don't. In the last election, the Green Party won about seven per cent of the vote nationwide, yet walked away with no seats in Parliament. A party that gains a significant amount of its support from young voters has no representation in our current government.

The NDP, another party that relies heavily on young voter support, received close to 18 per cent of the vote, and won 37 seats. In contrast, the Bloc Quebecois, which exists to push for the separation of Quebec from the rest of Canada, received just 10 per cent of the vote (all in Quebec), and won 49 seats.

Does this not explain why young people might feel as if their vote doesn't count for much? As a Brock student living in St. Catharines, I vote in a riding that is overwhelmingly Conservative. Since my vote was cast for a losing candidate, it is fair to say that I lack representation in the government that makes decisions for me.

Knowing I am in a mostly Conservative area, could I be blamed for not bothering to vote?

It's a shame that young people in Canada are faced with this system. It's no wonder that the closest we feel to our government is when it's "[getting] high with a little help from [his] friends".

Sunday, October 4, 2009

stephen, john, paul, george, ringo, yo yo ma

the real question is: more, or less respect for the prime minister?

i love canada.



byn

Sunday, June 21, 2009

FWD:

every once in awhile i get a fwd in my inbox that's actually worth reading. this was one of them:

"Letter to the Prime Minister"

Dear Mr. Harper,
Please find below my suggestion for fixing Canada's economy. Instead of
giving billions of dollars to banks and car companies, who will squander
the money on lavish parties and unearned bonuses, use the following plan:

There are about 20 million people over 50 in the work force. Pay them $1
million apiece severance for early retirement with the following stipulations:
1) They MUST retire. Twenty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They MUST buy a new Canadian car. Twenty million cars ordered - Auto
Industry fixed.
3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis
fixed.
4) They must send their kids to school / college /university - Crime rate
fixed.
5) Buy $50 of alcohol / tobacco / petrol a week... there's your money back
in duty / tax etc.
It can't get any easier than that!
P.S. If more money is needed, have all members of parliament pay back their
falsely claimed expenses and second home allowances.

think about it! (also, thank you to the anonymous author)

byn

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

kim jong-ILL

alright, first of all.. yeah i know its been forever. sorry, we're busy people. but thanks for sticking around.

now, to the point.

as per usual, refer to iht.com if you haven't heard about this. yesterday, north korea tested its first nuclear weapon "as part of the measures to bolster up its nuclear deterrent for self-defence in every way as requested by its scientists and technicians".

north korea. wtf? come on guys, what is it that you're actually trying to prove? guiness world record for the country that got wiped off the map the fastest maybe? trying to catch up to iran?

okay, too many questions. i understand stubbornness, trust me. you'd have a hard time convincing me that i'm wrong most of the time. i even argue with alex trebec sometimes on the pop-culture answers. but really, on the global stage, being stubborn when the US is telling you to stop what you're doing is pretty dumb. actually, it's not dumb. it's crazy. but i guess that's basically what we've come to expect from president kim jong-il. i also understand that i'm talking about a government that is more likely to spend its money on building a completely disproportionate military, rather than feed its people. regardless, claiming that you're developing and testing nuclear weapons for 'self defense' is fundamentally backwards. am i the only one seeing a theme here?

it doesnt take a whole lot of research to figure out that north korea is a total disaster. a military dictatorship in which people starve to death every day, all while tanks roll down the city streets, and the government brainwashes everyone into believing that they are a democratic, free people.

what makes me cynical? knowing that the international system that we have is totally incapable of simply doing what needs to be done to stop all of this from happening. too much red tape, too much bureaucracy. as it turns out, george bush had the right idea when he ignored the UN, took down the hussein regime, let the dictator be executed, and established a US occupation in iraq. he just picked the wrong country.

er

Saturday, May 2, 2009

don't panic!

this article (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/weekinreview/03rosenthal.html?_r=1&ref=global-home) offers some much needed perspective on the "imminent swine flu pandemic" that we can't seem to get enough of in the media. read it, then wash your hands. and then... go to mexico or something.

byn